Students taught with preclinical simulation achieved higher final course grades than the previous cohort taught without simulation (87.79 vs 83.07, p = 0.000)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? There was a statistically significant difference in final grades between students taught by simulation and students who were not, with the simulation group's mean total score of 87.79 (B+) versus 83.07 (B-). → ALFozan et al. 2015

Evidence¶

ALFozan et al. 2015¶

Haya ALFozan, Yousria El Sayed, Farida Habib. (2015). Designing, Implementing and Evaluating Preclinical Simulation Lab for Maternity Nursing Course. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.12. https://www.iiste.org/journals/

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Nonequivalent control group posttest-only comparison (Figure 5) between the simulation cohort and the previous year's cohort placed at clinical sites from the start. The article prints no effect size or test statistic beyond P = 0.000, and the authors note there was no concurrent control group.

"There was a statistically significant difference of the final g rades between students taught by simulation and stu dents who did not. Students taught by simulation had higher cours e total score."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Nursing students express positive perception of preclinical maternity simulation sessions, with objectives and information rated highest and fidelity/realism rated lowest — related
• Total perception score correlates positively with total outcome score (r = 0.709) and total satisfaction score (r = 0.740) — related