Claims

Simulation training in critical care during COVID-19 enhanced knowledge and confidence more than theoretical and clinical training alone

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across the included studies, simulation had a more pronounced impact than theoretical and clinical training alone on enhancing knowledge and confidence. → Nouira Hajer 2024

Evidence

Nouira Hajer 2024

Nouira Hajer, Jaoued Oussama, Ouanes Islem, Jrad Maissa, Chtioui Soumaya, Gharbi Rim, Fekih Hassen Mohamed, Ben Sik Ali Habiba, Elatrous Souheil. (2024). Implementation of simulation training in the Intensive Care Units (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. La Tunisie Médicale. https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v102i8.4972

q2 · i? · review · r2

Scoping review synthesis of its three education-focused included studies, summarized in Table 3. The review reports "a significant impact of simulation on enhancing knowledge and confidence"; no effect sizes are printed.

"All the three studies investigating the impact of simulation on education reported a significant impact of simulation on enhancing knowledge and confidence (Table 3)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.