Claims

Simulation-based education improves nursing students' clinical decision-making, judgment, and self-confidence

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of fifteen included studies, twelve reported significant improvements in nursing students' clinical decision-making, judgment, or self-confidence, involving over 1,100 participants. → Daneshfar Majid; Moonaghi Hossein Karimi 2025

Evidence

Daneshfar Majid; Moonaghi Hossein Karimi 2025

Daneshfar Majid; Moonaghi Hossein Karimi. (2025). The impact of clinical simulation on bridging the theory–practice gap in nursing education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07790-8

q2 · i? · review · r2

Systematic review of 15 studies (2010–2025) on clinical simulation in nursing education; the review reports "twelve reported significant improvements in nursing students’ clinical decision-making, judgment, or self-confidence". No meta-analysis was possible due to heterogeneity.

"Of the fifteen included studies, twelve reported significant improvements in nursing students’ clinical decision-making, judgment, or self-confidence, involving over 1,100 participants."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.