Claims

Simulation-based CRM training may translate to improved patient outcomes, including decreased mortality, based on a small number of studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? All five studies measuring patient outcomes (Kirkpatrick Level 4) found at least some improved patient outcomes after simulation CRM training, but only one found a clearly significant impact on patient mortality. → Boet Sylvain 2014

Evidence

Boet Sylvain 2014

Boet Sylvain, Bould M. Dylan, Fung Lillia, Qosa Haytham, Perrier Laure, Tavares Walter, Reeves Scott, Tricco Andrea C. (2014). Transfer of learning and patient outcome in simulated crisis resource management: a systematic review. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4028539/

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Systematic review synthesis of five studies measuring patient outcomes (Kirkpatrick Level 4), reporting that "Only one of these studies found that simulation-based CRM training made a clearly significant impact on patient mortality." Surrogate measures were grouped into efficiency of patient care, complications, length of stay, and survival/mortality.

"Five studies measured patient outcomes (Kirkpatrick Level 4). Only one of these studies found that simulation-based CRM training made a clearly significant impact on patient mortality."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.