Claims

Simulations shorter than 800 minutes show larger effects than simulations of 800 minutes or more

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The weighted effect size for simulations under 800 minutes (.86) exceeds that for 800 minutes or more (.67), though the median for the longer group falls below .50. → Mookyung Jeon 2018

Evidence

Mookyung Jeon 2018

Mookyung Jeon. (2018). Meta-Analysis of Disability Simulation Research for Elementary Students in Korea. International Journal of Special Education, 33(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1184078

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Moderator analysis by duration in the meta-analysis (Table 2): less than 800 minutes weighted ES .86; 800 minutes and more weighted ES .67 with median below .50. Reported durations ranged from 480 to 1200 minutes. The article calls the cause of this observation unclear.

"The median and weighted effect size for less than 800 minutes exceed .80. The weighted effect size for 800 min and more exceed .50 whereas the median effect size is less than .50."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.