Claims

Meta-analysis finds a favorable effect of high-fidelity ultrasound simulation training on accuracy of fetal biometry in obstetric ultrasound

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Meta-analysis of 4 studies shows favorable effect for improved accuracy of biometry in obstetric ultrasound after simulation training. → Dromey Brian P. MBChB 2021

Evidence

Dromey Brian P. MBChB 2021

Dromey Brian P. MBChB, MRCOG; Peebles Donald M. MBBS, MD, MRCOG; Stoyanov Danail V. PhD. (2021). A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Use of High-Fidelity Simulation in Obstetric Ultrasound. Simulation in Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000485

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Systematic review meta-analysis (Review Manager 5.3 and Meta-essentials) of 4 studies of fetal biometry outcomes, reported as a forest plot in Figure 2 showing a "favorable effect for improved accuracy of biometry" after simulation training. No standardized effect size is printed.

"The results are shown in Figure 2, finding favorable effect for improved accuracy of biometry in obstetric ultrasound after simulation training."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.