Claims

All four meta-analyzed studies reported positive effects of simulator training on novice performance, in CRL and FL measurement regardless of simulator model

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? All 4 studies in the quantitative analysis reported a positive effect on operator performance, in crown rump length and femur length measurement, regardless of simulator model. → Dromey Brian P. MBChB 2021

Evidence

Dromey Brian P. MBChB 2021

Dromey Brian P. MBChB, MRCOG; Peebles Donald M. MBBS, MD, MRCOG; Stoyanov Danail V. PhD. (2021). A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Use of High-Fidelity Simulation in Obstetric Ultrasound. Simulation in Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000485

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Quantitative synthesis of 4 pretest/posttest simulator studies: 214 participants recruited, 129 novices (56%); "All 4 studies reported positive effect on operator performance." Improvements were in CRL (3 studies) and FL (2 studies), seen regardless of simulator model.

"In total, 214 participants were recruited to the 4 studies and 129 were novice participants (56%). All 4 studies reported positive effect on operator performance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.