Claims

Simulation-based training improves suturing, cutting, and cautery skills

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Three studies reported significant improvement on suturing, cutting, and cautery skills in the trained group as compared to the control group. → Vanderbilt Allison A. 2015

Evidence

Vanderbilt Allison A. 2015

Vanderbilt Allison A., Grover Amelia C., Pastis Nicholas J., Feldman Moshe, Granados Deborah Diaz, Murithi Lydia K., Mainous Arch G. III. (2015). Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review of Laparoscopic Surgery and Simulation-Based Training. Global Journal of Health Science. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493882/

q3 · i? · review · r2

Review of 3 studies measuring suturing, cutting, and cautery skills, finding "significant improvement on suturing, cutting, and cautery skills in the trained group as compared to the control group."

"Three (14%) of the 21 studies reported significant improvement on suturing, cutting, and cautery skills in the trained group as compared to the control group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.