Claims

Simulator-based skills training improves performance in therapeutic endoscopic procedures (polypectomy, upper GI bleeding control, esophageal dilation)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A single-blind RCT cited by the review found simulator training significantly improved performance of polypectomy, control of upper GI bleeding, and esophageal dilation compared with knowledge-based teaching. → Qiao Weiguang 2014

Evidence

Qiao Weiguang 2014

Qiao Weiguang, Bai Yang, Lv Ruxi, Zhang Wendi, Chen Yuqing, Lei Shan, Zhi Fachao. (2014). The Effect of Virtual Endoscopy Simulator Training on Novices: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089224

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Narrative review discussion citing Haycock et al. (2009), described as a "single-blind, randomized, controlled trial" comparing knowledge-based teaching with simulator-based skills training across 4 therapeutic procedures; the review reports significant improvement in three of them.

"Simulator training group significantly improved performance of polypectomy, control of upper GI bleeding, and esophageal dilation [31]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.