Claims

Only one study linked physicians' prior training site to later patient outcomes, ranking programs by graduates' complication rates

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A single retrospective cohort study evaluated patient outcomes in relation to where practicing physicians completed residency training, covering 43% of accredited obstetrics and gynecology programs in the USA and ranking programs by maternal complication rates of their graduates. → van der Leeuw Renée M 2012

Evidence

van der Leeuw Renée M 2012

van der Leeuw Renée M, Lombarts Kiki MJMH, Arah Onyebuchi A, Heineman Maas Jan. (2012). A systematic review of the effects of residency training on patient outcomes. BMC Medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391170/

q2 · i? · associational · r2

The review reports on one retrospective cohort study of post-residency patient outcomes. It states that "43% of accredited obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in the USA (4,124 physicians from 107 residency programs) were evaluated", allowing programs to be ranked by graduates' maternal complication rates.

"In the only study on this subject, 43% of accredited obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in the USA (4,124 physicians from 107 residency programs) were evaluated."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.