Claims

A large percentage of retested cases show IQ variations large enough to change their classification, demonstrating the injustice of disposing of persons on the basis of a single test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1921 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A large percentage of cases shows IQ variations between tests that operate to change the classification, so disposing of persons under suspicion of mental defect on a single test is unjust. → Poull 1921

Evidence

Poull 1921

Poull, L. E. (1921). Constancy of the I.Q. in mental defectives according to the Stanford revision of Binet tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12(6), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071851

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Interpretation of the retest change distribution from the 126-case institutional sample: the article states "A large percentage of the cases shows variations which operate to change the classification"; no exact percentage or effect size is printed.

"The injustice of disposing of persons under suspicion of mental defect on the basis of a single test is clearly demonstrated. A large percentage of the cases shows variations which operate to change the classification"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id single-test-classification-unjust-iq-variation
title A large percentage of retested cases show IQ variations large enough to change their classification, demonstrating the injustice of disposing of persons on the basis of a single test
description A large percentage of retested cases show IQ variations large enough to change their classification, demonstrating the injustice of disposing of persons on the basis of a single test
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1921
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — poull-1921

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.