Participation in the SIS course increased ethical sensitivity on the 'generating interpretations and options' subscale relative to a control group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i3 Participants showed a significant increase in generating interpretations and options while the control group did not (interaction F(1,34) = 5.91, p = 0.02, η²p = 0.15). → Schutte et al. 2018

Evidence¶

Schutte et al. 2018¶

Ingrid Schutte, Elanor Kamans, Marca Wolfensberger and Wiel Veugelers. (2018). Effects of an International Undergraduate Honors Course on Awareness of Global Justice. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020082

q2 · i3 · causal · r1

Pre-posttest factorial repeated-measures analysis with control group (honors students not taking the course); N participants = 18, N control = 18 for ESS6. The simple effect showed "a significant increase of generating interpretations and options within the participant group F(1,34) = 5.95, p = 0.02, N2p = 0.15", with no increase in the control condition (F < 1). The printed effect size is η²p = 0.15 (printed as N2p = 0.15), a large partial eta-squared.

"Results revealed a significant interaction, with respect to the subscale generating interpretations and options (ESS6) F(1,34) = 5.91, p = 0.02, N2p = 0.15."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Course participants scored higher on social awareness than controls at the end of the course, though the pre-post interaction was not significant — related