A six-factor measurement model of university governance shows convergent validity in the Vietnamese context¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Exploratory factor analysis extracted six factors matching the theoretical framework, with loadings from 0.61 to 0.84 and 85.2% total variance explained, supporting the measurement structure. → Truong 2025
Evidence¶
Truong 2025¶
Truong, T. D. (2025). Factors Determining Governance Effectiveness in Vietnamese Universities: A Mixed-Method Investigation. Educational Process: International Journal, 19, e2025605. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.19.605
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Exploratory factor analysis (Table 7) of the 455-respondent survey. The article reports six factors with loadings "ranging from 0.61 to 0.84, exceeding the acceptable threshold of 0.50" and 85.2% cumulative variance explained.
"The total variance explained by the six factors was 85.2%, a very high value, indicating that the six-factor model accounts for the majority of the variance in the original dataset."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Financial governance shows no statistically significant direct effect on governance effectiveness when modeled with other factors — related
- The original global citizenship scale is employable in a developing-country university context after adjustments to social responsibility and global competence — related
- The policy-legal framework is the second strongest predictor of governance effectiveness in Vietnamese universities — related
- Leadership competence is the strongest predictor of governance effectiveness in Vietnamese universities — related
- The social responsibility measurement model required the most item removals, with global justice and personal responsibility items dropped in the Vietnamese context — related
- The measurement model showed adequate reliability and convergent validity, and BI and UB models showed substantial explanatory power — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
six-factor-governance-model-convergent-validity |
title |
A six-factor measurement model of university governance shows convergent validity in the Vietnamese context |
description |
A six-factor measurement model of university governance shows convergent validity in the Vietnamese context |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — truong-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.