Claims

The social responsibility measurement model required the most item removals, with global justice and personal responsibility items dropped in the Vietnamese context

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the social responsibility model, items GJD3-GJD6, AE2, and GIPR1, GIPR3, GIPR4 were removed for outer factor loadings below 0.7, and remaining indicators met CR and AVE standards. → Nguyen 2021 q2 i? The removed global justice and personal responsibility items differed significantly from prior validations, suggesting these items should be modified in the current context. → Nguyen 2021 (2)

Evidence

Nguyen 2021

Nguyen, M. T. (2021). Validating a Scale for Measuring Students' Perspectives toward Global Citizenship: A Case at a Private University in Vietnam. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(3), 575-587. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.362

q2 · i? · the article prints no effect size for this finding · associational · r2

PLS-SEM assessment of the social responsibility model against the 0.7 outer loading threshold. After removal, CR and AVE figures met requirements (e.g., AE CR 0.756, AVE 0.608), and HTMT figures were below 0.85.

"As a result, the following items were removed in the measurement model for Social Responsibility: GJD3, GJD4, GJD5, GJD6; AE2; GIPR1 GIPR3, GIPR4. Then, GIPR became the latent variable with a single indicator."

Nguyen 2021 (2)

Nguyen, M. T. (2021). Validating a Scale for Measuring Students' Perspectives toward Global Citizenship: A Case at a Private University in Vietnam. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(3), 575-587. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.362

q2 · i? · the article prints no effect size for this finding · associational · r1

Author's interpretation of the removed items: students did not appear to believe the global justice statements, and the pattern differed from prior validations in developed-country contexts.

"These results were significant different from the validation of Morais and Ogden (2011) and Roberts and Wilson (2016, which suggest that these items should be modified in the current context rather than keeping the original ones."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id social-responsibility-model-items-removed-vietnam
title The social responsibility measurement model required the most item removals, with global justice and personal responsibility items dropped in the Vietnamese context
description The social responsibility measurement model required the most item removals, with global justice and personal responsibility items dropped in the Vietnamese context
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
recheck_by 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — nguyen-2021, nguyen-2021-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.