Claims

Latent profile analysis of secondary students' log-file engagement in a digital chemistry textbook identifies six distinct cognitive and metacognitive engagement profiles

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? LPA on log-file indicators of passive, active, constructive, and metacognitive engagement yielded a best-fitting six-profile solution with high classification accuracy. → Yoana Omarchevska 2026

Evidence

Yoana Omarchevska 2026

Yoana Omarchevska, Brendan A. Schuetze, Juliane Richter, Sascha Schanze, Nina Ulrich, Katharina Scheiter. (2026). From Passive to Metacognitive: The Role of Mode of Engagement in Enabling Lasting Learning Using Digital Media. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10120-z

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Latent profile analysis of log-file engagement indicators from 235 students using the mclust algorithm in the tidyLPA package; models with 1 to 10 profiles were compared. The authors report the six-profile solution was best by BIC and parsimony, with "entropy = 0.98".

"A comparison of Bayesian Information Criteria along with a preference for parsimony suggested that a six-profile solution was the best solution among the tested models, see Fig. 6."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id six-latent-profiles-engagement-digital-chemistry-textbook
title Latent profile analysis of secondary students' log-file engagement in a digital chemistry textbook identifies six distinct cognitive and metacognitive engagement profiles
description Latent profile analysis of secondary students' log-file engagement in a digital chemistry textbook identifies six distinct cognitive and metacognitive engagement profiles
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yoana-omarchevska-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.