Elementary school children show distinct latent profiles of procedural metacognition combining monitoring accuracy, restudy effectiveness, and decision accuracy across tasks¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Latent profile analyses identified distinct metacognition profiles at both grade levels and both measurement points, confirming heterogeneity in the quality of monitoring and control skills. → Mariëtte van Loon 2024
Evidence¶
Mariëtte van Loon 2024¶
Mariëtte van Loon, Claudia M. Roebers. (2024). Development of metacognitive monitoring and control skills in elementary school: a latent profile approach. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09400-2
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Latent profile analyses of six z-standardized indicators (monitoring accuracy, effective restudy, decision accuracy for text and Kanji tasks) among the 151 second and 176 fourth graders who took part at the first measurement point; only children who completed both the text and the Kanji task at a measurement point were included, so each analysis used fewer children than took part. Three-profile solutions were selected per grade at each time point, "confirming H1" that profiles differ in metacognitive quality.
"In sum, for both age groups and at both time points, identified profiles showed differences in the quality of metacognitive monitoring and control skills (confirming H1)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Fourth graders outperform second graders on secret-code performance and restudy effectiveness, but not on self-monitoring discrimination — related
- Task performance relates to metacognition profile membership at the first measurement point but not one year later — related
- Metacognition profile classifications differ between second and fourth graders — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Generalizability of metacognitive skills across tasks increases between ages eight and eleven — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Fourth graders with low metacognition tend to remain low one year later, particularly showing ineffective restudy decisions — related
- Effective restudy selection is the metacognitive skill that most distinguishes children's profiles — related
- Latent profile analysis of secondary students' log-file engagement in a digital chemistry textbook identifies six distinct cognitive and metacognitive engagement profiles — related
- Elementary students with reading difficulties constitute two distinct latent profiles: one with higher basic language and cognitive skills and lower attention, the other with stronger attention and lower basic language and cognitive skills — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
distinct-metacognition-profiles-lpa-children |
title |
Elementary school children show distinct latent profiles of procedural metacognition combining monitoring accuracy, restudy effectiveness, and decision accuracy across tasks |
description |
Elementary school children show distinct latent profiles of procedural metacognition combining monitoring accuracy, restudy effectiveness, and decision accuracy across tasks |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mariëtte-van-loon-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.