Expert ratings support the content validity of the SKT-SRL scenarios and strategies¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Seventeen SRL experts mostly assigned scenarios to intended phases and components, and their strategy rankings matched the a priori useful/less-useful classifications. → Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich 2024

Evidence¶

Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich 2024¶

Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, Jörn R. Sparfeldt, Franziska Perels. (2024). Knowing how to learn: development and validation of the strategy knowledge test for self-regulated learning (SKT-SRL) for college students. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09379-w

q2 · i? · design · r3

Expert rating study with 17 German-speaking SRL researchers who assigned scenarios to phases and components, suggested strategies, ranked strategies, and rated usefulness. The a priori useful strategies were always ranked in the top three by experts, and all useful strategies had mean usefulness ratings higher than three.

"The three strategies that we classified a priori as useful were always among the top three expert strategies while the three less useful a priori strategies were always ranked in the bottom three expert strategies."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The SKT-SRL shows acceptable-to-very good internal consistency across subscales — related