The SKT-SRL shows acceptable-to-very good internal consistency across subscales¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In Validation Study 1, Cronbach's alpha values were respectable-to-very good for all scenario subscales, component subscales, and the total scale. → Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich 2024
Evidence¶
Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich 2024¶
Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, Jörn R. Sparfeldt, Franziska Perels. (2024). Knowing how to learn: development and validation of the strategy knowledge test for self-regulated learning (SKT-SRL) for college students. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09379-w
q2 · i? · design · r3
Psychometric analysis in Validation Study 1 (N = 99 teacher education and psychology students) after an adapted scoring mechanism; scenario subscale alphas ranged from .77 to .84 per Table 5, with the total scale showing strong reliability.
"Regarding reliability evidence, Cronbach's alpha values were respectable-to-very good for all the scenario subscales, the component subscales, and the total scale."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Expert ratings support the content validity of the SKT-SRL scenarios and strategies — related
- Existing online SRL questionnaires show reliability problems, with most having at least one scale outside the acceptable Cronbach's alpha range — related
- The MAKQ dimensions show acceptable internal consistency across both studies (alphas 0.77-0.93) — related
- The post-interaction reflection instrument showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .863) — related
- The GAA-LS shows satisfactory-to-strong internal consistency and evidence of convergent and discriminant validity — related
- TAILS dimensions show high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values above 0.90 — related
- Questionnaire constructs showed acceptable to strong internal consistency (α = 0.740 to 0.945) — related
- The survey instrument's nine constructs show convergent and discriminant validity in this sample — related
- The three PSRBVBQ scales show good internal consistency, with Cronbach's alphas of .732 (perceived severity), .841 (response to bully) and .897 (response to victim) — related
- The post-study survey instrument showed high internal consistency (alpha = 0.90) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
skt-srl-reliability |
title |
The SKT-SRL shows acceptable-to-very good internal consistency across subscales |
description |
The SKT-SRL shows acceptable-to-very good internal consistency across subscales |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2027 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — laura-dörrenbächer-ulrich-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.