Claims

Students taught with the SLC method show higher learning-independence questionnaire scores than students taught with lecture method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experiment group's mean independence score was 81.40 versus 68.66 for the control group, with 86.67% of SLC students at high independence level. → Dwi Sulisworo 2017

Evidence

Dwi Sulisworo 2017

Dwi Sulisworo, Novitasari Sutadi. (2017). Science Learning Cycle Method to Enhance the Conceptual Understanding and the Learning Independence on Physics Learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 6(1). http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive analysis of the 20-item Likert independence questionnaire in the quasi-experiment (Tables 6-7). The article reports means of 81.40 versus 68.66 and that "86.67% is a high learning independence who received SLC model, but 87.50% of students who received treatment lecture method were low".

"the average scores of students in the experiment group were 81.40 and the control group was 68.66. It means that the learning independence of student who used SLC method is better than the students who used the other model"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.