Claims

Evidence on sleep duration and cognitive development in children aged 0–4 years is mixed, with no consistent association

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q2–q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? One randomized trial found explicit recognition memory was better after naps than wake, while implicit memory did not differ. → Chaput JP 2017 q2 i? Cross-sectional evidence is mixed: 7 of 11 studies null, 3 favouring longer sleep, 1 opposite. → Chaput JP 2017 (2)

Evidence

Chaput JP 2017

Chaput JP, Gray CE, Poitras VJ, Carson V, Gruber R, Birken CS, MacLean JE, Aubert S, Sampson M, Tremblay MS. (2017). Systematic review of the relationships between sleep duration and health indicators in the early years (0–4 years). BMC Public Health 17(Suppl 5):855. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4850-2

q3 · i? · review · r3

Randomized cross-over trial (n = 23) in the review's cognitive development section; GRADE quality "high". Only significance is printed, no effect size, so impact is null.

"The number of correct answers in an explicit recognition task was significantly higher in the nap (control) compared to the wake (sleep-restricted) condition, whereas implicit memory (priming task) did not differ between conditions [ 65]."

Chaput JP 2017 (2)

Chaput JP, Gray CE, Poitras VJ, Carson V, Gruber R, Birken CS, MacLean JE, Aubert S, Sampson M, Tremblay MS. (2017). Systematic review of the relationships between sleep duration and health indicators in the early years (0–4 years). BMC Public Health 17(Suppl 5):855. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4850-2

q2 · i? · review · r3

Narrative synthesis of 11 cross-sectional studies (10,838 participants); GRADE quality "low". The review characterises overall cognitive evidence as mixed with mainly favourable or null longitudinal findings.

"of 11 cross-sectional studies, 7 reported null findings [38, 51, 55, 70 – 73], 3 reported that shorter sleep duration was associated with poorer cognitive function [57, 74, 75], and 1 reported opposite associations [76]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id sleep-cognitive-development-mixed-early-years
title Evidence on sleep duration and cognitive development in children aged 0–4 years is mixed, with no consistent association
description Evidence on sleep duration and cognitive development in children aged 0–4 years is mixed, with no consistent association
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — chaput-jp-2017, chaput-jp-2017-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.