Claims

Short sleep duration at age 3 was not associated with quality of life at about age 13

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A single longitudinal study found short sleep at 3 years (<10 h vs >11 h) was not associated with poor quality of life at ~13 years. → Chaput JP 2017

Evidence

Chaput JP 2017

Chaput JP, Gray CE, Poitras VJ, Carson V, Gruber R, Birken CS, MacLean JE, Aubert S, Sampson M, Tremblay MS. (2017). Systematic review of the relationships between sleep duration and health indicators in the early years (0–4 years). BMC Public Health 17(Suppl 5):855. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4850-2

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Single longitudinal study (n = 9674, ~10-year follow-up) in the review's quality of life section; GRADE "very low" due to parent-reported sleep. OR = 1.15 with CI crossing 1; equivalence not tested.

"Short sleep duration at 3 years of age (< 10 h vs. > 11 h) was not associated with quality of life at age ~13 years (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.99 – 1.33, p = 0.06) [82]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id sleep-quality-of-life-null-longitudinal
title Short sleep duration at age 3 was not associated with quality of life at about age 13
description Short sleep duration at age 3 was not associated with quality of life at about age 13
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — chaput-jp-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.