Data collection implementation and sample size are the most frequent limitations in digital competence research¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Implementation of the data collection method was the most frequent limitation (n = 14), followed by sample size (n = 12) and lack of available and reliable data (n = 7). → Zhao Yu 2021

Evidence¶

Zhao Yu 2021¶

Zhao Yu, Pinto Llorente Ana María, Sánchez Gómez María Cruz. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 168, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212

q2 · i? · review · r2

Systematic review classification of limitations (Table 4) across the 33 selected investigations. Data collection implementation was most frequent (n = 14), sample size second (n = 12), lack of available and reliable data (n = 7); 17 articles had more than one limitation and eight indicated none.

"the implementation of the data collection method was the most frequent limitation in the 33 selected researches (n = 14). Then the size of the sample presented to be a research limitation that usually had in the articles (n = 12)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The most frequent limitation of AI in instructional design is content reliability and transparency (16 of 28 studies, 57.14%) — related
• Perception and level assessment dominates research purposes in digital competence studies of higher education — related
• Infrastructure, connectivity or limited access is the most frequent barrier (45.2%) to digitally supported teacher education — related
• In the AI-focused subset, professional development and teacher accompaniment (35.0%) and instructional design and assessment (32.5%) are the predominant approaches, with pedagogical limitations the main barrier — related