Claims

Students completing smartphone activities show significantly less distraction than students doing identical paper-based activities

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? No experimental-group students were distracted during smartphone tasks, while control-group students were distracted in 16 of 19 treatment sessions, a significant difference. → Pir Suhail Ahmed Sarhandi 2017

Evidence

Pir Suhail Ahmed Sarhandi 2017

Pir Suhail Ahmed Sarhandi, Ayman Bajnaid & Tariq Elyas. (2017). Impact of Smartphone Based Activities on EFL Students' Engagement. English Language Teaching, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n6p103

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Teachers rated distracted students on a Likert scale after each of 19 treatment sessions for both groups (n= 38). Fisher's exact test showed the groups "significantly differed by distraction (n= 38), p < 0.001"; no experimental students were distracted.

"It is interesting to note that none of the students in th e experiment group were distracted while undertaking tasks using their smartphones, as compared to the control group, where some of the students were distracted by factors outside the task in 16/ 19 of the treatment sessions. A Fisher's exact test revealed that the experimental and control groups significantly differed by distraction (n= 38), p < 0.001."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.