Claims

Indices of centrality and density were the SNA measures most often used in e-learning research

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among the SNA measures applied in the included e-learning studies, indices of centrality and density were the most frequently used. → Cela 2015

Evidence

Cela 2015

Cela, K.L., Sicilia, M.Á. & Sánchez, S. (2015). Social Network Analysis in E-Learning Environments: A Preliminary Systematic Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9276-0

q2 · i? · review · r?

Descriptive synthesis finding from the systematic review of 37 studies: "Indices of centrality and density were the SNA measures most often used." The review prints no frequency counts or effect sizes for this statement in the available text.

"Indices of centrality and density were the SNA measures most often used."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id sna-elearning-review-centrality-density-most-used
title Indices of centrality and density were the SNA measures most often used in e-learning research
description Indices of centrality and density were the SNA measures most often used in e-learning research
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — cela-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.