Claims

Synchronous online learning did not significantly affect affective outcomes compared with asynchronous online learning (g = 0.32, p = .051)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 Across eleven studies, the pooled effect of synchronous versus asynchronous online learning on affective outcomes was positive but not statistically significant, with the confidence interval overlapping zero. → Florence Martin 2021

Evidence

Florence Martin 2021

Florence Martin, Ting Sun, Murat Turk, and Albert D. Ritzhaupt. (2021). A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Synchronous Online Learning on Cognitive and Affective Educational Outcomes. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Volume 22, Number 3. https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl

q3 · i1 · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effects meta-analysis of eleven studies comparing synchronous with asynchronous online learning on affective outcomes (satisfaction, emotions, attitudes, motivation). The pooled g = 0.32 was marginal (p = .051); equivalence was not tested. Heterogeneity was significant (Q = 50.19, p < .001).

"The results of the weighted average applying a random model revealed that SOL did not have a statistically significant effect on affective outcomes (g = 0.32, p = .051), with a 95% confidence interval of -0.001 to 0.641."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.