Claims

First-year Chinese EFL majors taught with song education scored 3.1 points higher on the Comprehensive English Course post-test than a parallel control class

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After one semester, the experimental group averaged 84.5 on the post-test versus 81.4 for the control group, having been nearly equal on the pre-test (78.6 vs 78.3). → Mai Xiaomei & Mai Quansheng 2018

Evidence

Mai Xiaomei & Mai Quansheng 2018

Mai Xiaomei & Mai Quansheng. (2018). The Efficacy of Song Education to Develop English Proficiency for Chinese EFL Majors. English Language Teaching, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n12p166

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment with 48 first-year English majors in two parallel classes (24 each) sharing one teacher; the experimental class received songs in addition to the same tasks. The article reports the descriptive averages "84.5" and "81.4" and a 3.1-point difference, with no statistical test or effect size printed.

"The average score of the post-test for the experimental group is 84.5, as compared to a lower 81.4 of the control group. Thus a relati vely significant difference of 3.1 points has been notified."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.