Trained students outperformed controls at selecting the more reliable of two contradictory texts, at both post-tests¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 In the near transfer question, the trained group outperformed the control group at post-test 1 and post-test 2, with no group difference at pre-test. → Ana Pérez 2018

Evidence¶

Ana Pérez 2018¶

Ana Pérez, Anna Potocki, Marc Stadtler, Mônica Macedo-Rouet, Johanna Paul, Ladislao Salmerón, Jean-François Rouet. (2018). Fostering Teenagers' Assessment of Information Reliability: Effects of a Classroom Intervention focused on Critical Source Dimensions. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.006

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Mixed-effects logistic regression on selection accuracy in the near transfer question of the same 137-student classroom intervention. Post-hoc comparisons showed "the trained group outperformed the control group in the post-test 1" (OR = 0.19, CI 0.05-0.64) and post-test 2 (OR = 0.31, CI 0.09-1.08).

"whereas the trained group outperformed the control group in the post-test 1, χ² (1) = 14.90, p < .001 (OR = 0.19, CI 0.05-0.64), and post-test 2, χ² (1) = 7.19, p < .05 (OR = 0.31, CI 0.09-1.08)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• PAIR-C scaffolding shows mixed evidence for deep understanding and reduced misconceptions in emergent-phenomena instruction — related
• Metacognitive reflection training improves young children's DCCS performance, with behavioral and neural changes — related
• Spatial Training Improves Math Performance — related
• The training shows no significant transfer to academic learning tasks, with only a marginal post-test advantage in number conservation — related
• Both errorful learning methods improve design critique (understanding the indeterminacy of invalid experiments) equally, outperforming errorless practice — related