The optimal spacing interval is bounded by reactive inhibition at short intervals and skill deterioration at long intervals¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q1
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Very short inter-training intervals suffer reactive inhibition while very long intervals cause skill deterioration and forgetting, suggesting an inverted U-curve relation between spacing interval and skill acquisition. → Fahl Jan Torge 2023
Evidence¶
Fahl Jan Torge 2023¶
Fahl Jan Torge, Duvivier Robbert, Reinke Laurens, Pierie Jean-Pierre E. N., Schönrock-Adema Johanna. (2023). Towards best practice in developing motor skills: a systematic review on spacing in VR simulator-based psychomotor training for surgical novices. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04046-1
q1 · i? · review · r3
Theoretical argument in the review's discussion, drawing on Smith et al.'s suggested inverted U-curve between spacing interval and skill acquisition. This is the authors' interpretive account, not a tested result of the review itself.
"Reactive inhibition negatively impacts the effectiveness of massed or distributed training using short (e.g., 15 minutes) inter-training intervals. At the same time, longer inter-training intervals (e.g., 14 days) result in skill deterioration, forgetting and ineffective training"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- No difference in bronchoscopy skill test scores between one-day spaced and weekly distributed training in Bjerrum et al. — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Spaced VR simulator training yields better performance and faster skill acquisition than massed training for surgical psychomotor skills — related
- ISI effects on recall are nonmonotonic and depend jointly on retention interval — a broader claim this one bears on
- In paired-associate paradigms, the lag function is decreasing at very short retention intervals, inverted U-shaped at slightly longer intervals, and monotonically increasing at long intervals — a broader claim this one bears on
- In continuous recognition memory, the lag function is inverted U-shaped after a short retention interval and monotonically increasing after a long retention interval — a broader claim this one bears on
- Spaced trainees completed endoscopic exercises 18.7% faster than massed trainees in Verdaasdonk et al. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.