Evidence for transfer of simulation training to operating-room outcomes was sparse in neuro-oncological simulation research¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The review found sparse evidence supporting transferability of simulation training to the operating room, with only a handful of studies exploring direct impact on intraoperative efficiency, complication rates, or surgical success. → Menna Grazia 2025

Evidence¶

Menna Grazia 2025¶

Menna Grazia, Riva Dora, Marino Salvatore, Garber Jocelyn, Gerritsen Jasper Kees Wim, Mattogno Pier Paolo, Young Jacob Stewart, Olivi Alessandro, Doglietto Francesco, Berger Mitchel Stuart, Della Pepa Giuseppe Maria. (2025). Simulation tools in neuro-oncological surgery: a scoping review of perioperative and training applications. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-04972-8

q3 · i? · review · r2

The review's Discussion states that "evidence supporting the transferability of simulation training to the operating room was sparse" and that only a handful of studies examined direct impact on intraoperative outcomes.

"Furthermore, evidence supporting the transferability of simulation training to the operating room was sparse. While some studies measured post-training improvements in technical skills and decision-making, only a handful explored the direct impact on intraoperative efficiency, complication rates, or surgical success."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• AR simulators for tumor localization and intraoperative guidance were tested on small patient subsets, limiting generalizability — related
• Scoping review identified 51 studies of simulation in neuro-oncological surgery, with AR the most frequently studied technology (25 of 51 articles) — related
• Most reviewed simulation studies demonstrated face and content validity, but few assessed construct or predictive validity — related
• No longitudinal studies or RCTs demonstrate that AI-acquired skills transfer to the operating room — related
• Evidence on transfer to clinical behavior and patient outcomes is scarce: only 2 studies reached Kirkpatrick level 3 and 1 reached level 4 — related
• Evidence on simulation-based leadership training lacks longitudinal follow-up and objective patient-centered outcomes, limiting causal inference — related