Evidence on transfer to clinical behavior and patient outcomes is scarce: only 2 studies reached Kirkpatrick level 3 and 1 reached level 4¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Only 2 of 104 studies evaluated physicians' behaviors (Kirkpatrick level 3), and a single study reported patient health care outcomes (level 4). → Wei W 2026
Evidence¶
Wei W 2026¶
Wei W, Nielsen MS, Nielsen AB, Han Y, Russell L, Konge L, Cold KM. (2026). Hands-on Distance Simulation of Technical Skills: A Systematic Review. Simulation in Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000881
q3 · i? · review · r3
Review synthesis using Kirkpatrick's framework across 104 studies; the review reports only 2 studies at level 3 (clinical intubation performance, telesupervised ultrasound scans) and 1 at level 4 (postoperative visual acuity after cataract surgery training).
"Only 2 studies involved physicians' behaviors (Kirkpatrick level 3, 2 points): one on intubation performance during clinical anesthesia29 and another on telesupervised ultrasound scans.31 A single study reported health care outcomes (Kirkpatrick level 4, 3 points) of patients' postoperative visual acuity following cataract surgery training32"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Training on a simple low-fidelity 'choose-the-hole' bench model transferred to real clinical fibreoptic intubation performance in an RCT — related
- Evidence for technology-enhanced basic robotic skills training is concentrated at Kirkpatrick level 2, with no studies reporting transfer to operative behaviour or patient outcomes — related
- Reviewed peer-tutoring simulation studies mostly reached only Kirkpatrick Level 2, with no assessment of behavior change or clinical-practice results — related
- Outcome evaluation of AI-generated virtual patients in HPE is concentrated at Kirkpatrick level 1, with no studies reporting level 3 or 4 outcomes — related
- Competency-based simulation effects are large for skills measured in the simulation lab but small and non-significant for clinical behaviors and patient outcomes — related
- In 18% (3/16) of included simulation studies, positive clinical trends did not reach statistical significance — related
- Kirkpatrick's four levels of evidence can be applied to RAS training, with level 2 equating to RAS skills assessed with validated scoring systems during simulation. — related
- No longitudinal studies or RCTs demonstrate that AI-acquired skills transfer to the operating room — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- No included SDL studies measured Kirkpatrick Level 4 (patient/system) outcomes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.