Claims

Evidence on transfer to clinical behavior and patient outcomes is scarce: only 2 studies reached Kirkpatrick level 3 and 1 reached level 4

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Only 2 of 104 studies evaluated physicians' behaviors (Kirkpatrick level 3), and a single study reported patient health care outcomes (level 4). → Wei W 2026

Evidence

Wei W 2026

Wei W, Nielsen MS, Nielsen AB, Han Y, Russell L, Konge L, Cold KM. (2026). Hands-on Distance Simulation of Technical Skills: A Systematic Review. Simulation in Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000881

q3 · i? · review · r3

Review synthesis using Kirkpatrick's framework across 104 studies; the review reports only 2 studies at level 3 (clinical intubation performance, telesupervised ultrasound scans) and 1 at level 4 (postoperative visual acuity after cataract surgery training).

"Only 2 studies involved physicians' behaviors (Kirkpatrick level 3, 2 points): one on intubation performance during clinical anesthesia29 and another on telesupervised ultrasound scans.31 A single study reported health care outcomes (Kirkpatrick level 4, 3 points) of patients' postoperative visual acuity following cataract surgery training32"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.