Longitudinal evidence shows spatial ability predicts STEM educational and occupational outcomes beyond mathematical and verbal ability¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In longitudinal talent-search samples, spatial ability accounted for statistically significant additional variance beyond SAT-Mathematical and SAT-Verbal in predicting math–science criteria. → Jeffrey Buckley 2018 q2 i? The review reports, citing Wai et al., that talent searches miss intellectually talented students by restricting selection criteria to mathematical and verbal ability measures. → Jeffrey Buckley 2018 (2)

Evidence¶

Jeffrey Buckley 2018¶

Jeffrey Buckley, Niall Seery, Donal Canty. (2018). A Heuristic Framework of Spatial Ability: a Review and Synthesis of Spatial Factor Literature to Support its Translation into STEM Education. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9432-z

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports Shea et al.'s longitudinal tracking of 563 talent-search participants (top 0.5% for their age group), in which "spatial ability was found to account for a statistically significant amount of additional variance" beyond the SAT scales for math–science criteria.

"Additionally, spatial ability was found to account for a statistically significant amount of additional variance beyond SA T -Mathematical and SA T-V erbal in predicting these math–science criteria."

Jeffrey Buckley 2018 (2)¶

Jeffrey Buckley, Niall Seery, Donal Canty. (2018). A Heuristic Framework of Spatial Ability: a Review and Synthesis of Spatial Factor Literature to Support its Translation into STEM Education. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9432-z

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review attributes to Wai et al. (2009) the finding, based on Project TALENT and modern longitudinal comparisons, that "contemporary talent searches miss many intellectually talented students by restricting selection criteria to mathematical and verbal ability measures."

"contemporary talent searches miss many intellectually talented students by restricting selection criteria to mathematical and verbal ability measures"

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Spatial Ability — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes

Related Claims¶

• Spatial skills uniquely predict 27% of the variance in preschool mathematics over and above executive function — related
• Executive function and spatial skills jointly predict 70% of the variance in age-4 mathematics performance without an explicit number-knowledge measure — related
• IQ and working memory are reliable predictors of academic achievement at the beginning of school when domain knowledge is not controlled — related
• A spatial STEM curriculum yields far transfer to improved verbal deductive reasoning in high school students, including on nonspatial relation trials — related
• Spatial ability correlates moderately with mathematics achievement (r = .25), less strongly than verbal ability — related
• Visuo-spatial working memory and inhibition jointly predict mathematics performance in 9–10-year-old children — related
• Spatial assembly skill measured at age 3 (TOSA) strongly correlates with mathematics performance one year later at age 4 — related
• Spatial ability interventions have increased STEM performance and retention, but a causal effect remains categorically unestablished — related
• Spatial ability correlates with educational performance across many STEM disciplines and sub-disciplines — related
• Five specialized structural systems emerge as separate factors in factorial studies from preschool age to adulthood — related