Specific goals show distinct directional effects: mastery approach and relational goals predict positive affect, beneficial help attitudes, and teaching quality, while work avoidance and appearance avoidance goals predict poorer outcomes.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · associationalr2–r3·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Positive affect was positively predicted by task approach, normative approach, and relational goals, and negatively by normative avoidance and work avoidance goals. → Daumiller 2019
q3 i? Help-seeking attitudes: learning approach, task approach and relational goals predicted perceiving help as useful; learning approach goals negatively and work avoidance goals positively predicted perceiving it as a threat. → Daumiller 2019 (2)
q3 i? Teaching quality was positively predicted by task approach, appearance approach, and relational goals, and negatively by appearance avoidance goals. → Daumiller 2019 (3)
Evidence¶
Daumiller 2019¶
Daumiller, M., Dickhäuser, O., & Dresel, M. (2019). University Instructors' Achievement Goals for Teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000271
q3 · i? · associational · r3
Path coefficients from the SEM (CFI = .99) showed "positive affect was positively predicted by task approach, nor- mative approach, and relational goals, and negatively predicted by normative avoidance and work avoidance goals" after controlling for all other goals.
"positive affect was positively predicted by task approach, nor- mative approach, and relational goals, and negatively predicted by normative avoidance and work avoidance goals."
Daumiller 2019 (2)¶
Daumiller, M., Dickhäuser, O., & Dresel, M. (2019). University Instructors' Achievement Goals for Teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000271
q3 · i? · associational · r2
In the same structural model, "learning approach, task approach and re la- tional goals had positive effects on perceiving help seeking as useful"; learning approach goals negatively and work avoidance goals positively predicted perceiving help seeking as a threat.
"Regarding the attitudes towards help seeking, we found that learning approach, task approach and re la- tional goals had positive effects on perceiving help seeking as useful."
Daumiller 2019 (3)¶
Daumiller, M., Dickhäuser, O., & Dresel, M. (2019). University Instructors' Achievement Goals for Teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000271
q3 · i? · associational · r2
In the SEM of Hypothesis 3, "teaching quality was posi- tively predicted by task approach, appearance ap- proach, and relational goals, and negatively predicted by appearance avoidance goals".
"Finally, teaching quality was posi- tively predicted by task approach, appearance ap- proach, and relational goals, and negatively predicted by appearance avoidance goals."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Achievement Goal Orientation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- University instructors' performance goals split into four classes: appearance and normative components, each approach and avoidance. — related
- University instructors' achievement goals differentially predict positive affect, attitudes towards help, and self-reported teaching quality, with effects invariant across status groups. — related
- Pre-actional metacognitive, motivational, and positive-emotional components are positively associated with regulatory behavior in the actional phase, while anger and anxiety are negatively associated — related
- Mastery-approach goals are positively related to time management, while performance-approach relations are inconsistent and performance-avoidance goals show no association — related
- Work avoidance and relational goals form goal classes distinct from all other achievement goal classes of university instructors. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
specific-goal-directional-effects-on-outcomes |
title |
Specific goals show distinct directional effects: mastery approach and relational goals predict positive affect, beneficial help attitudes, and teaching quality, while work avoidance and appearance avoidance goals predict poorer outcomes. |
description |
Specific goals show distinct directional effects: mastery approach and relational goals predict positive affect, beneficial help attitudes, and teaching quality, while work avoidance and appearance avoidance goals pre... |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
3 — daumiller-2019, daumiller-2019-2, daumiller-2019-3 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.