Mastery-approach goals are positively related to time management, while performance-approach relations are inconsistent and performance-avoidance goals show no association¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2–r3·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Research generally supports a positive connection between mastery-approach goals and time management. → Christopher A. Wolters 2025
q2 i? Performance-approach goals show both positive and null relations with time management, and performance-avoidance goals show no association. → Christopher A. Wolters 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Christopher A. Wolters 2025¶
Christopher A. Wolters, Anna C. Brady, Hyun Ji Lee. (2025). Time Management and Achievement Motivation: A Review of What We Know and Directions for Where to Go. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10032-4
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports Won et al.'s structural model with US college students in which mastery goals positively predicted self-reported time management (β = 0.27). Corroborating studies include Ranellucci et al. (rs = 0.43, 0.40) and Zhou and Wang (r = 0.74 for mastery-approach).
"These researchers found that US college students' (N = 385) reported focus on mastery goals was positively correlated (r = 0.39) and a positive predictor (β = 0.27) of their self-reported level of time management in a structural model."
Christopher A. Wolters 2025 (2)¶
Christopher A. Wolters, Anna C. Brady, Hyun Ji Lee. (2025). Time Management and Achievement Motivation: A Review of What We Know and Directions for Where to Go. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10032-4
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review's summary of the small achievement-goal literature reports inconsistent performance-approach findings (e.g., r = 0.15 in one study, positive correlations in others) and null performance-avoidance relations across studies. No two researchers used the same measures of goals or time management.
"The relation between performance-approach goals and time management has been less consistent with both positive and null relations reported, whereas the adoption of performance-avoidance goals has not been associated with decreased time management as models of SRL might typically predict."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Achievement Goal Orientation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Mastery-approach, performance-approach, and performance-avoidance goals positively predict engagement, while mastery-avoidance goals do not, in AI-assisted English learning — related
- Mastery and performance-approach goals positively predict self-efficacy while performance-avoidance goals negatively predict it across all three grade levels — related
- Teacher support correlates with mastery-approach and performance-approach goals and engagement, but not with avoidance-oriented goals — related
- Teacher support positively predicts mastery-approach and performance-approach goals, but not mastery-avoidance or performance-avoidance goals, in AI-assisted English learning — related
- Achievement goals show small consistent correlations with academic achievement, positive for approach goals and negative for avoidance goals — related
- For effective self-regulators, mastery goals have a large positive and performance-avoidance goals a small negative effect on metacognition — related
- Epistemic beliefs about the justification of scientific knowledge predict mastery and performance-approach goals positively and performance-avoidance goals negatively in fifth grade — related
- Only mastery-approach and performance-approach goals mediate the relationship between teacher support and engagement in AI-assisted English learning — related
- Specific goals show distinct directional effects: mastery approach and relational goals predict positive affect, beneficial help attitudes, and teaching quality, while work avoidance and appearance avoidance goals predict poorer outcomes. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
mastery-approach-goals-time-management |
title |
Mastery-approach goals are positively related to time management, while performance-approach relations are inconsistent and performance-avoidance goals show no association |
description |
Mastery-approach goals are positively related to time management, while performance-approach relations are inconsistent and performance-avoidance goals show no association |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — christopher-a-wolters-2025, christopher-a-wolters-2025-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.