SpellRead™ shows potentially positive effects on comprehension for adolescent readers, with an average improvement index of +11¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Across two RCTs including 137 adolescent readers, SpellRead™ received a WWC rating of potentially positive effects in the comprehension domain, with improvement indices ranging from –2 to +24 and a domain-average effect size of 0.27. → comprehension-summary
Evidence¶
comprehension-summary¶
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. (2013, January). Adolescent Literacy intervention report: SpellRead™. http://whatworks.ed.gov
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1
WWC synthesis of two randomized controlled trials meeting evidence standards without reservations. The summary table prints an average improvement index of "+11" with range "–2 to +24" for comprehension, based on 2 studies and 137 students, with extent of evidence rated "Small".
"Comprehension Potentially positive effects +11 –2 to +24 2 137 Small"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The WWC rates Project CRISS® as having potentially positive effects on comprehension for adolescent learners, with an average improvement index of +20 percentile points — related
- SpellRead™ shows potentially positive effects on alphabetics for adolescent readers, with an average improvement index of +23 across two studies — related
- SpellRead™ shows potentially positive effects on reading fluency for adolescent readers, with an average improvement index of +14 — related
- In the Rashotte, MacPhee, and Torgesen (2001) RCT, SpellRead™ produced statistically significant positive effects on alphabetics and reading fluency for fifth- and sixth-grade struggling readers after eight weeks — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- In the Torgesen et al. (2006) RCT, SpellRead™ showed indeterminate effects for fifth graders, with no statistically significant or substantively important effects in any domain after six months — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- READ 180® has positive effects on reading comprehension for adolescent readers in grades 4–12 — related
- The WWC rates Reading Apprenticeship® as having potentially positive effects on comprehension for adolescent learners, based on one study — related
- Repeated reading has potentially positive effects on reading comprehension for students with learning disabilities, with a small extent of evidence — related
- Comprehension effects of SpellRead™ differed between the two studies: Torgesen et al. found no significant effects while Rashotte et al. found significant effects on both outcomes — related
- SpellRead™ has potentially positive effects on reading comprehension, with an average improvement index of +20 percentile points — related
- Twenty participants aged 3 to 14 with varying disabilities all demonstrated literacy gains through shared story reading — related
- SpellRead™ has potentially positive effects on reading fluency, with an average improvement index of +9 percentile points — related
- SpellRead™ has positive effects on alphabetics for struggling beginning readers, with an average improvement index of +18 percentile points — related
- Lexia Reading has potentially positive effects on comprehension — related
- Word-reading interventions yield significant positive effects on adolescent literacy outcomes overall (g = 0.30) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
spellread-potentially-positive-comprehension |
title |
SpellRead™ shows potentially positive effects on comprehension for adolescent readers, with an average improvement index of +11 |
description |
SpellRead™ shows potentially positive effects on comprehension for adolescent readers, with an average improvement index of +11 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — comprehension-summary |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.