Suggesting the SPP at detected boredom did not change its use: students were almost never bored, so SPP use was not reliably different between conditions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In an experiment where the tutor suggested the SPP upon detecting deactivating negative affect, students self-reported almost never being bored, so the tutor almost never made suggestions and total SPP use did not reliably differ between experimental and control groups. → Arroyo 2014
Evidence¶
Arroyo 2014¶
Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., Burelson, W., Muldner, K., Rai, D., & Tai, M. (2014). A Multimedia Adaptive Tutoring System for Mathematics that Addresses Cognition, Metacognition and Affect. Int J Artif Intell Educ 24:387–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Experimental evaluation of the SPP as a metacognitive intervention with an affective cross-over purpose: the experimental condition received SPP suggestions at detected boredom while controls had the same page available via a button. The article reports "the total amount of use of the SPP was not reliably different" between groups; equivalence was not tested.
"students were almost never bored in this experiment, so Wayang almost never suggested that they use the SPP . As a result, the total amount of use of the SPP was not reliably different between the experimental and control groups of students."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Participants rated frustrated and bored instructors higher on negative than positive emotion scales, with the frustrated effect stronger when the agent was on screen — related
- Emotions measured early in the semester longitudinally predict cumulative grades and exam scores, with negative deactivating emotions (hopelessness, boredom) showing stronger coefficients than activating negative emotions — related
- Positive academic emotions correlate positively with interest, effort, flexible learning strategies, and perceived self-regulation, while boredom and hopelessness correlate negatively with all of these motivational variables — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
spp-boredom-suggestion-null |
title |
Suggesting the SPP at detected boredom did not change its use: students were almost never bored, so SPP use was not reliably different between conditions |
description |
Suggesting the SPP at detected boredom did not change its use: students were almost never bored, so SPP use was not reliably different between conditions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2014 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — arroyo-2014 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.