The Jigsaw and control groups differed significantly in scientific process skills before treatment¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? An independent samples t-test found a significant difference between the groups' average SPST pre-test scores, with the experimental group higher (22,20 vs 19,09). → Ataman Karacop 2017

Evidence¶

Ataman Karacop 2017¶

Ataman Karacop, Emine Hatun Diken. (2017). The Effects of Jigsaw Technique Based on Cooperative Learning on Prospective Science Teachers' Science Process Skill. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.8, No.6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133003

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent samples t-test on SPST pre-test scores of the quasi-experimental groups (control n=23, experimental n=25) reported in the Results section; descriptive means were 19,09 (control) and 22,20 (experimental).

"The analysis showed that there was a significant difference betw een the average SPST pre-test scores of the control and experimental groups (t=2,019; p=0,049)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A Jigsaw-based laboratory approach develops student teachers' scientific process skills more than a confirmatory laboratory approach — related
• Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly in initial-test grades before the intervention — related
• Student teachers' opinions of the Jigsaw and confirmatory laboratory approaches do not differ significantly — related