Claims

Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly in initial-test grades before the intervention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? There was no significant difference between the two focus groups in grades average at the initial test (experimental A=4.21, control A=4.19). → Monica-Iuliana Anca & Muşata Bocoş 2017

Evidence

Monica-Iuliana Anca & Muşata Bocoş 2017

Monica-Iuliana Anca & Muşata Bocoş. (2017). The Role of Independent Activities in Development of Strategic Learning Competences and Increase of School Performance Level, within the Study of High School Pedagogy. Educatia 21 Journal, (15). https://doi.org/10.24193/ed21.2017.15.07

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pre-test comparison using the t test for independent focus groups after a Levene test accepted variance homogeneity; averages were 4.21 (experimental, n=84) and 4.19 (control, n=81). Equivalence beyond the non-significant test was not tested.

"Whereas p>α (0.05), the H0 hypothesis is accepted, meaning there are no significant difference between the two focus groups in what concerns the grades average values at the initial test."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.