Claims

During the SQ3R intervention, students' words read per minute and word recognition percentages improved, with only four students reaching the 120-words-per-minute benchmark

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? NWPM and WRP increased for all seven students across the intervention, but only four participants developed to the desired level of at least 120 words per minute. → Bulut 2017

Evidence

Bulut 2017

Aydın Bulut. (2017). Improving 4th Grade Primary School Students' Reading Comprehension Skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(1): 23-30. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050103

q2 · i? · design · r2

Observational fluency measurement (Table 3) during the Reading stage of the intervention, which used oral, silent, echo and chorus reading. The article reports "all the students' reading levels increased"; e.g., Şevval moved from 48 NWPM/75% WRP before to 93 NWPM/88% WRP after.

"According to Güneş [41], p rimary school 4thgrade students should be able to re ad at l east 120 words per minute. In this sense, it is possible to see that both the n umber of words per minute a nd wo rd reco gnition percentages wer e bel ow this av erage a nd that only f our participating students developed to the desired level."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.