Claims

The SQ4R group's reading comprehension advantage persisted on a permanence test administered four weeks after the post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Four weeks after the post-test, the experimental group's permanence-test mean (4.12) remained significantly higher than the control group's (2.92). → Başar 2017

Evidence

Başar 2017

Başar, M. & Gürbüz, M. (2017). Effect of the SQ4R Technique on the Reading Comprehension of Elementary School 4th Grade Elementary School Students. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 131-144. http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2017_2_9.pdf

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Permanence test applied to both groups four weeks after the post-test. The article reports the experimental group's mean remained higher and "significant [t(55)=1.064, p<.001]"; experimental scores partially increased while control scores declined. No effect size is printed.

"the score average of experimental group (Avg=4.12) is higher than that of the control group (Avg=2.92) and is found to be quite significant [t(55)=1.064, p<.001]"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.