Claims

Junior secondary students taught Basic Science with a self-regulated learning approach achieved higher adjusted mean scores than students taught with the conventional method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The treatment group taught with the self-regulated learning approach achieved a higher adjusted mean achievement score (55.07) than the control group taught with the conventional method (40.24), a statistically significant difference. → Nwafor Chika E 2015

Evidence

Nwafor Chika E 2015

Nwafor Chika E, Abigail Chikaodinaka Obodo, Gabriel Okafor. (2015). Effect of Self Regulated Learning Approach on Junior Secondary School Students' Achievement in Basic Science. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.5. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083647

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental pretest posttest non-equivalent control group study with four intact JSS II classes in two Nigerian schools; hypotheses tested with ANCOVA at alpha 0.05. The "calculated F-ratio (F-cal) due to teaching method is 217.427" exceeded the critical value 3.89, so the null hypothesis was rejected. Adjusted means were 55.07 (treatment) versus 40.24 (control).

"the ANCOVA result in Table 4 show s that the calculated F-ratio (F-cal) due to teaching method is 217.427 while the critical value (F-critical) at alpha level of 0.05 is 3.89"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.