Claims

There is no significant interaction between gender and teaching method on students' achievement in Basic Science

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The two-way interaction of teaching method and gender was not significant (F-calculated .425, below the critical value 3.89), while the treatment group's adjusted mean exceeded the control group's at both male and female levels. → Nwafor Chika E 2015

Evidence

Nwafor Chika E 2015

Nwafor Chika E, Abigail Chikaodinaka Obodo, Gabriel Okafor. (2015). Effect of Self Regulated Learning Approach on Junior Secondary School Students' Achievement in Basic Science. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.5. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083647

q2 · i? · causal · r1

ANCOVA with interaction term (Table 4: Teaching Methods & Gender, F = .425). The researcher upholds the null hypothesis of no significant interaction between gender and method. Adjusted means favoured the treatment group for both males (56.11 vs 40.82) and females (52.86 vs 39.70).

"for the two-way interaction, the F-calculated is .425 which is less than the critical value of 3.89 at alpha value of 0.05"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.