Claims

Identified SRL interventions all focused on goal setting and monitoring and none on supporting self-evaluation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Three types of intervention were identified (coaching, learning plans and supportive tools), but all focused on goal setting and monitoring and none on supporting self-evaluation. → van Houten‐Schat Maaike A 2018

Evidence

van Houten‐Schat Maaike A 2018

van Houten‐Schat Maaike A, Berkhout Joris J, van Dijk Nynke, Endedijk Maaike D, Jaarsma A Debbie, Diemers Agnes D. (2018). Self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13615

q3 · i? · review · r3

Synthesis of nine studies addressing interventions to support SRL in medical students and residents. The review identified three intervention types and found "none on supporting self‐evaluation", a gap the authors call regulatory appraisal.

"Three types of intervention were identified (coaching, learning plans and supportive tools). However, all interventions focused on goal setting and monitoring and none on supporting self‐evaluation."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.