Self-regulated learning moderates the indirect effect of AI use on critical thinking through cognitive load¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The index of moderated mediation is statistically significant (B = −0.002, 95% CI −0.004 to −0.000), so the indirect effect varies across levels of self-regulated learning. → Arshad A 2026
Evidence¶
Arshad A 2026¶
Arshad A, Lone A, Arickswamy L, Hassan K, Alnaim AA and AlFarhan MF (2026) From AI use to critical thinking among medical students: a moderated mediation perspective on cognitive load and self-regulated learning. Front. Psychol. 17:1883053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1883053
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Moderated mediation analysis in the same 480-student cross-sectional survey. The mediating role of cognitive load was stronger among students with lower self-regulatory abilities and weaker among those with higher self-regulated learning skills.
"the index of moderated mediation was statistically significant [B=−0.002, SE=0.000, 95% CI (−0.004,−0.000)], as the confidence interval did not include zero. This finding indicates that the indirect effect of AI-based educational technology use on critical thinking through cognitive load significantly varied across levels of self-regulated learning."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Self-Regulation — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
Related Claims¶
- AI-based educational technology use is positively associated with critical thinking among undergraduate medical students — related
- Cognitive load partially mediates the relationship between AI-based educational technology use and critical thinking — related
- Self-regulated learning moderates the cognitive load–critical thinking relationship, buffering the negative effect of load — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Self-regulated learning and critical AI evaluation promote effective AI use — related
- The SRL and SAL perspectives on student motivation and learning differ, and the article discusses those differences — related
- The indirect effect of GenAI use on critical thinking via feedback literacy is conditional on reflective thinking, strengthening as reflectivity rises — related
- Self-regulatory activities mediate the relationship between person, context, and achievement — related
- Cognitive load is negatively associated with critical thinking and with self-regulated learning — related
- Affect, motivation, and cognitive load did not mediate the relationship between error condition and CVS learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
srl-moderates-indirect-ai-effect |
title |
Self-regulated learning moderates the indirect effect of AI use on critical thinking through cognitive load |
description |
Self-regulated learning moderates the indirect effect of AI use on critical thinking through cognitive load |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — arshad-a-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.