No SRSD study met WWC group design standards; 10 of 14 eligible single-case design studies met pilot standards with reservations¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Of the eligible studies, none met group design standards and none met pilot single-case design standards without reservations; 10 met pilot single-case design standards with reservations, covering 43 children ages 7 to 16 with a specific learning disability. → Self-Regulated Strategy Development: WWC Intervention Report 2017

Evidence¶

Self-Regulated Strategy Development: WWC Intervention Report 2017¶

Self-Regulated Strategy Development: WWC Intervention Report. (2017). What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/680

q2 · i? · review · r3

The WWC research summary screening of two eligible group design studies and 14 eligible single-case design studies. The report states the 10 qualifying studies "included 43 children ages 7 to 16 who had a specific learning disability." No effect size is printed.

"No studies meet WWC group design standards. No studies meet pilot single-case design standards without reservations, and 10 studies meet pilot single-case design standards with reservations."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Self-regulated learning improves achievement — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
• SRSD had potentially positive effects on writing achievement for students with a specific learning disability, with 88% of single-case experiments showing positive effects — related
• Single-case design evidence for SRSD on math achievement does not reach the WWC threshold for inclusion in effectiveness ratings — related