Single-case design evidence for SRSD on math achievement does not reach the WWC threshold for inclusion in effectiveness ratings¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The math achievement evidence base (one study, one research team, three cases) failed the WWC replication threshold criteria, so no effectiveness rating was assigned for math achievement. → Self-Regulated Strategy Development: WWC Intervention Report 2017

Evidence¶

Self-Regulated Strategy Development: WWC Intervention Report 2017¶

Self-Regulated Strategy Development: WWC Intervention Report. (2017). What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/680

q2 · i? · review · r3

The WWC review's threshold analysis for the math achievement domain. Table 1 shows the domain rested on 1 study from 1 research team with 3 cases, below the criteria requiring at least five studies, three research teams, and 20 total cases. No effect size is printed.

"The evidence from the single-case design studies for SRSD does not reach the threshold to include single-case design evidence in the effectiveness ratings for one outcome domain—math achievement."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• SRSD had potentially positive effects on writing achievement for students with a specific learning disability, with 88% of single-case experiments showing positive effects — related
• No SRSD study met WWC group design standards; 10 of 14 eligible single-case design studies met pilot standards with reservations — related