Task-based inhibitory control (Stop Signal Task) improves curvilinearly from ages 11 to 15, with growth slowing around middle adolescence¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Latent growth curve models showed SSRT declined linearly and quadratically across ages 11–15, indicating curvilinear improvement in task-based inhibitory control with growth slowing around middle adolescence. → Fosco 2019
q3 i? There were significant individual differences in both initial levels and rate of change of task-based inhibitory control, and worse inhibitory control at age 11 was associated with a steeper rate of improvement. → Fosco 2019
Evidence¶
Fosco 2019¶
Fosco, W. D., Hawk, L. W. Jr., Colder, C. R., Meisel, S. N., & Lengua, L. J. (2019). The development of inhibitory control in adolescence and prospective relations with delinquency. Journal of Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.08.008
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Latent growth curve modeling of three annual Stop Signal Task assessments in a community sample of 387 adolescents (96% retention Waves 1–3), with age centered at 11. The model showed "the average SSRT at age 11 was 206 ms" with significant linear and quadratic decline; significant intercept (σ2 = 3841, p<.001) and slope (σ2 = 236, p=.023) variance indicated individual differences in level and change.
"the average SSRT at age 11 was 206 ms and showed both a linear, b=−39 ms, p<.001, and quadratic decline across age, b=5 ms, p<.001"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Child IQ, sex, and parental income do not predict initial levels or growth of task-based inhibitory control — related
- Lower inhibitory control in early adolescence predicts greater increases in delinquency from middle adolescence to emerging adulthood — related
- Rate of growth in task-based inhibitory control is unrelated to later delinquent behavior — related
- Parent-reported inhibitory control (EATQ-R) shows no detectable growth from early to middle adolescence — related
- Performance on inhibitory control measures improves with age, with some tasks reaching performance plateaus beginning around 4 years of age — related
- Reactive inhibition speed and accuracy improve with age between 8 and 11 years, while proactive response slowing does not increase with age — related
- Average and superior children develop at different levels and grow increasingly dissimilar with age, with superior children showing adolescent mental acceleration about one year earlier — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
sst-inhibitory-control-curvilinear-growth-adolescence |
title |
Task-based inhibitory control (Stop Signal Task) improves curvilinearly from ages 11 to 15, with growth slowing around middle adolescence |
description |
Task-based inhibitory control (Stop Signal Task) improves curvilinearly from ages 11 to 15, with growth slowing around middle adolescence |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — fosco-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.