Claims

The authors' review of standalone educational games found they are not always based on sound educational principles and theories

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A review of standalone educational games showed that they are not always based on sound educational principles and theories. → Gunter 2008

Evidence

Gunter 2008

Gunter, G.A., Kenny, R.F. & Vick, E.H. (2008). Taking educational games seriously: using the RETAIN model to design endogenous fantasy into standalone educational games. Education Tech Research Dev, 56, 511–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9073-2

q2 · i? · theoretical · r?

The authors' own review of standalone educational games, reported in the article's abstract. It concludes the games are "not always based on sound educational principles and theories"; no review method, corpus size, or criteria are printed in the available text.

"Our review of standalone educational games has shown that they are not always based on sound educational principles and theories."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id standalone-educational-games-not-always-theory-based
title The authors' review of standalone educational games found they are not always based on sound educational principles and theories
description The authors' review of standalone educational games found they are not always based on sound educational principles and theories
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2008
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — gunter-2008

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.