Claims

Standardized SBE programs were more likely to improve outcomes than independent programs in LMICs (78% vs. 71%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Standardized programs were more likely to be associated with improvement in outcomes than independent programs (78% vs. 71%). → Robinson SJA 2024

Evidence

Robinson SJA 2024

Robinson SJA, Ritchie AMA, Pacilli M, Nestel D, McLeod E, Nataraja RM. (2024). Simulation-Based Education of Health Workers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Glob Health Sci Pract. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00187

q2 · i? · review · r3

Descriptive comparison within the review's narrative synthesis of 97 included studies, distinguishing standardized curricula (e.g., Helping Babies Breathe) from independent single-context programs. The review reports "78% vs. 71%" improvement rates; no statistical test of this difference is printed.

"Standardized programs were more likely to be associated with improvement in outcomes when compared to independent programs (78% vs. 71%)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.