Research education is a mainstay, individual-level strategy within multidimensional research capacity building initiatives in health settings¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Research education and training programs are a sustaining feature of many multidimensional RCB strategies, likely because undergraduate health curricula insufficiently cover research. → King 2022

Evidence¶

King 2022¶

King, O., West, E., Lee, S., Glenister, K., Quilliam, C., Wong, S. A., & Beks, H. (2022). Research education and training for nurses and allied health professionals: a systematic scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03406-7

q2 · i? · review · r2

Background synthesis in the review's introduction: RCB strategies combine education and training, funding for embedded researchers, strategic collaborations and infrastructure, and research education is a sustaining feature of many. The authors link this to insufficient research coverage in undergraduate health curricula.

"RCB strategies often comprise a combination of the aforementioned approaches [8] and notably, research education and training programs are a sustaining feature of many [2, 3, 6, 8–11]."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Research education programs in health settings often fail to account for adult learning principles and theories and are not always formally evaluated — related
• Resource mismatch, missing incentives, and discontinuous post-training support constrain the sustainability of training transfer — related
• Standardized SBE programs were more likely to improve outcomes than independent programs in LMICs (78% vs. 71%) — related