Claims

Standing desks are associated with higher academic engagement in primary-school classrooms

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In Dornhecker et al., intervention classrooms showed higher academic engagement than controls in both fall (+4.21) and spring (+0.72) semesters. → Guirado Terry 2021

Evidence

Guirado Terry 2021

Guirado Terry, Chambonnière Camille, Chaput Jean-Philippe, Metz Lore, Thivel David, Duclos Martine. (2021). Effects of Classroom Active Desks on Children and Adolescents’ Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, Academic Achievements and Overall Health: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062828

q2 · i? · review · r3

Table 4 entry for Dornhecker et al. (2015), a non-randomized controlled study across 3 elementary schools (N=282, grades 2–4) using the BOSS observation method over 5 months. Engagement favored the standing-desk group in both semesters (p = 0.003 each); grade-level differences were not significant. No standardized effect size is printed.

"Academic engagement: Fall semester: IG > CG: +4.21 (p = 0.003) Spring semester: IG > CG: +0.72 (p = 0.003)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.